首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of Experimental Chlorine Based Post Milking Teat Dips vs. a Commercial Iodine Post Milking Teat Dip on Teat End and Teat Skin Condition and Health
【2h】

Evaluation of Experimental Chlorine Based Post Milking Teat Dips vs. a Commercial Iodine Post Milking Teat Dip on Teat End and Teat Skin Condition and Health

机译:评估基于氯的实验性挤奶后乳头相对于商用碘化奶后乳头浸在乳头末端和乳头皮肤状况及健康方面的效果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of experimental chlorine based post milking teat dips compared to a commercial iodine post milking teat dip on overall teat end and teat skin condition and health using a half udder within cow control model. A secondary aspect was to try to assess whether chlorine concentration or presence of additives had any effects. There were 3 trials with 3 pens (5, 6, and 1) in this study. Each pen (trial) evaluated an experimental chlorine post dip vs. Theratec utilizing a half udder design where left teats were dipped post milking with Theratec and right teats were dipped with the chlorine product. Chlorine products were 4000 ppm w/ no additive or additives for pens 5 and 6, and 2000 ppm + additive in Pen 1. Teat skin (1=normal, 2=slightly dry; 3 = chapped) and teat end (1-1.5 = normal; 2-3= smooth ring; 3.5-4 = rough ring; 4.5-5 very rough ring) scoring was performed two times per week. Mixed procedure of SAS with repeated measured (mixed model with quarter within cow as a repeated measure) were used to analyze average teat skin score (TSS), average teat end scores (TES), and % rough teats, with p \u3c.05 considered significant. There were no significant differences between Theratec and all the chlorine based teat dips (except teat ends during the first week for 2000 ppm Cl + additive) regarding teat skin and teat end health and integrity. All teats maintained excellent teat skin throughout the trials (teat skin score 1). Although there were no significant differences between dips in regards to teat end health and integrity, there were significant changes in teat end scores and % cracked teats over time related to weather and temperature changes. Changes to colder temperatures resulted in a higher average teat end score and greater % teats cracked, while changes to warmer temperatures showed a reverse trend. Addition of additive to the dips seemed to speed up the healing process on teat ends. Although the temperature effects were not completely blocked by the dips, the teat ends did remain hydrated and soft (not dry). Overall, the chlorine based teat dips performed as well as an excellent commercial iodine post milking teat dip.
机译:这项研究的目的是在奶牛对照模型中,使用半乳来评估实验性基于氯的挤奶后乳头浸液与商业碘挤奶后乳头浸液对总体乳头末端和乳头皮肤状况及健康的影响。第二个方面是尝试评估氯浓度或添加剂的存在是否有任何影响。在这项研究中,有3笔3笔(5、6和1)进行了试验。每只钢笔(试验)利用半乳设计评估了试验后的氯相对于Theratec的实验性,其中在用Theratec挤奶后将左乳头浸入,并且用氯产品浸入右乳头。氯产品的含量为4000 ppm w /无添加剂或5号和6号笔的添加剂,以及笔1中的2000 ppm +添加剂。奶嘴皮(1 =正常,2 =稍干; 3 =裂)和奶头(1-1.5 =正常; 2-3 =光滑环; 3.5-4 =粗糙环; 4.5-5非常粗糙的环)每周进行两次评分。使用重复测量的SAS混合程序(混合模型,以四分之一奶牛作为重复测量)来分析平均乳头皮肤得分(TSS),平均乳头终点得分(TES)和%粗糙乳头,其中p \ u3c.05被认为是重要的。 Theratec和所有基于氯的乳头浸液(除2000 ppm Cl +添加剂在第一周的乳头终止)在乳头皮肤和乳头末端的健康和完整性方面均无显着差异。在整个试验过程中,所有奶嘴均保持着出色的奶嘴皮肤(整皮得分1)。尽管浸入量在乳头健康和完整性方面无显着差异,但随着时间的推移,与天气和温度变化相关的乳头得分和破乳百分数有显着变化。较低温度的变化导致较高的平均奶嘴得分和较高的破裂乳头百分比,而较高温度的变化则显示出相反的趋势。向蘸料中添加添加剂似乎可以加快乳头端的愈合过程。尽管浸入并未完全阻止温度的影响,但奶头的末端仍保持水合柔软(不干燥)。总体而言,基于氯的乳头浸液表现出色,并且挤奶后的乳头浸液具有出色的商业碘含量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号